Page 1 of 1
2015 First Run
Posted: Sun Jan 04, 2015 6:52 pm
by Gralyn
I had the first run on the Overdale Valley Light Railway today. It was to try out a pair of Newquida bogie wagons after regauging from 45mm to 32mm.

and
Two short Videos both show that there is still a little work to do checking the back to back measurements as both wagons came off the track without any noticeable reason. Both wagons were ballasted but I think the ballast needs to be on the bogies rather than in the wagon
http://youtu.be/9z6QqbsintU
http://youtu.be/hZ3vji-F984
Posted: Sun Jan 04, 2015 7:36 pm
by MDLR
It's interesting how critical back-to-back measurements can be: I had an IP Engineering 4 wheel coach which would NOT stay on the track at certain points on the Butterley circuit. I checked the BTB with my trusty Roundhouse gauge, only to find that the wheels were less than a millimetre too far apart (ie wide to gauge). Some gentle work with pliers (to detach one axlebox from the solebar) and hammer (to correct the BTB) resulted in a coach that now runs very happily!
Posted: Sun Jan 04, 2015 7:49 pm
by Soar Valley Light
It's an incredibly critical dimension in 12" to the foot scale so likely to be even more so when scaled down.
Wide back to back pushes the flanges harder against the gauge faces of the rails. As the flange is inclined on the face that meets the rail this force will naturally lead it to climb. With no suspension of any sort our vehicles will naturally 'rock' a great deal more than the prototype. It wouldn't take much of a rock, on a wheelset already climbing the rail, to lift the flange clear of the rail head and allow the vehicle to run into derailment.
This problem is even worse on the crossing noses of turnouts where such a situation will be highly likely to result in the flange going the wrong side of the crossing nose.
It amazes me that no one has ever developed compensation or even full blown springing in 16mm scale models. It's used quite successfully in Scalefour, it would make even more difference in 16mm. Although the effects would be very minimal it would be enough to prevent at least some derailments of this type.
Andrew
Posted: Sun Jan 04, 2015 7:59 pm
by MDLR
Soar Valley Light:107199 wrote:It amazes me that no one has ever developed compensation or even full blown springing in 16mm scale models.
It has, and some kits do have it, but you have to remember why many of us ended up modelling in this scale. I always tell people that I model in 16mm so that if I drop a piece on the floor, I can (a) see it and (b) pick it up again, which might cause a problem with sprung axleboxes and fully compensated underframes!
Posted: Sun Jan 04, 2015 8:38 pm
by Peter Butler
On some of my stock I sometimes, although not always, us a sort of compensation. In the first picture I have made up two identical units to hold the wheels and axles. On the finished model one of these is fixed to the underside of the truck, the other has a small brass tube attached in its centre line on top of the unit running from back to front. This is then fixed to the vehicle with a wire threaded through the tube and the unit allowed to tip by a small amount left and right. A spacer equal to the additional height of the tube should be added to the fixed unit to keep the vehicle level.
The second picture shows the two units attached to the undercarriage separate from the chassis rail so movement is not restricted. It only needs movement of say 2mm to allow all wheels to stay in contact with the rails at all times.

Posted: Sun Jan 04, 2015 8:46 pm
by MDLR
Cunning!
Posted: Sun Jan 04, 2015 10:05 pm
by Soar Valley Light
Hi Guys,
I knew if I made a bold statement it would produce some comment!
Peter,
Your system is very similar to the compensation system used in scalefour. I'm sure it minimises the number of derailments on your line. I shall investigate something similar myself when I get round to rolling stock construction. It will be interesting to see how the various kits are suited to accepting such an arrangement.
I see Brian's point about keeping things simple completely but like all things in modelling - each to his own!
Here's to keeping on the straight and narrow - no matter how we do it!
Andrew
Posted: Sun Sep 13, 2015 3:47 am
by mightymax
Love the look of that little engine. Where did it come from and what powers it?
Posted: Sun Sep 13, 2015 7:42 am
by ge_rik
Another really elegant solution, Peter. I must try something similar on a couple of wagons which have a longer wheelbase and sometimes struggle over my rather poorly laid trackwork.
I have used a similar approach to solve a problem I had with my double ended (ford-ish) railmotor bashed from a couple of early Andel coaches.
I seldom used them for around a couple of years after I had constructed them because they were so unreliable. They would leave the track at regular intervals. I tried replacing the wheels several times and adjusted the back to backs on numerous occasions without success. Eventually, after lying on my stomach and carefully scrutinising her negotiating a notorious black spot, I figured her long wheelbase and fixed chassis was the problem.
Fortunately, the wheels were attached to the body with GRS brass U-brackets.
It was a fairly simple process to solder a short length of brass rod along the centre line of one bracket on each coach and drill a hole at either end of the rod.
The brackets were then re-attached to the body with a couple of self-tappers, not fully tightened, so the brackets could wiggle.
<object width="640" height="480"><param name="movie" value="
http://www.youtube.com/v/4d4NtVFDfR8?ve ... ram><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="
http://www.youtube.com/v/4d4NtVFDfR8?ve ... n_US&rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="640" height="480" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object>
She is now one of my most reliable runners and I'll often get her out to run a quick passenger service when the fancy takes me.
Rik
Posted: Sun Sep 13, 2015 10:56 am
by Gralyn
mightymax:113403 wrote:Love the look of that little engine. Where did it come from and what powers it?
The small green loco is a Garden Railway Specialist generic Hunslet kit with their 0-4-0 chassis which can be bought with either 45mm or 32mm gauge. The chassis has a MFA como motor . My loco is battery powered 10 AA rechargeable batteries in the saddle tank and Deltang R/C.
Posted: Sun Sep 13, 2015 11:47 am
by dougrail
Sprung stock?
I have a whole rake of coaches with sprung axleboxes.
I have also just invested two hundred dorrah' on a fleet of Newqida coaches, GRS steeler wheels and Accy couplers - I hop that they will not derail!