Passing loops and brake and vans...
Passing loops and brake and vans...
If I'm running a tank loco with a rake of open wagons and a brake van at the back, and want to reverse the train so it's running bunker first...
...whats the procedure? If I only have a passing loop?
...whats the procedure? If I only have a passing loop?
-
- Retired Director
- Posts: 3536
- Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 11:00 pm
If I just run the loco around though, the brake van would be coupled between the loco and the wagons, not at the end of the train.SillyBilly wrote:Run-Round, and attach a red flag to the back.
Last edited by alan2525 on Tue Aug 19, 2008 12:06 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Retired Director
- Posts: 3536
- Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 11:00 pm
Sounds like the game where you have to get the fox, the chicken and the grain across the river without them eating each other.
Think you would need to do a bit of shuffling back and fourth.
Can the loco pass the wagons to get to the break van, then take it along the passing loop, leave it on the track, and then go back down the passing loop to get to the other end of the train, then the break van will need to be hooked up.
Erm, it is sort of clear in my head, and will need a passing loop longer than the train.
Think you would need to do a bit of shuffling back and fourth.
Can the loco pass the wagons to get to the break van, then take it along the passing loop, leave it on the track, and then go back down the passing loop to get to the other end of the train, then the break van will need to be hooked up.
Erm, it is sort of clear in my head, and will need a passing loop longer than the train.
-
- Retired Director
- Posts: 3536
- Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 11:00 pm
-
- Trainee Driver
- Posts: 826
- Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 4:22 pm
I'm sure! Some of the locos even had jacks on them for sliding them back onto the rails after they've derailed. Derailments seem to be a regular occurrence on industrial narrow gauge!made-in-england wrote:narrow gauge industrial railways when in origanal operation would have been very crude.
example.. Loco comes off... Go get another one infront of it to pull it back on the tracks. OR as i have seen somewhere get a JCB and pull it back on sideways!
-
- Trainee Driver
- Posts: 826
- Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 4:22 pm
-
- Retired Director
- Posts: 3536
- Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 11:00 pm
So accordingly to true narrow gauge practice the sequence should be:
1. Run Round
2. Uncouple Brake Van
3. Brake Van to other side of loop
4. Collect wagons
5. Run in to the other side of the loop
6. Derail wagons and or loco over the points
7. Use another loco to rerail the errant train onto tracks or drag locomotive sideways onto rails using a JCB.
8. Couple up brakevan
9. Away you go!
1. Run Round
2. Uncouple Brake Van
3. Brake Van to other side of loop
4. Collect wagons
5. Run in to the other side of the loop
6. Derail wagons and or loco over the points
7. Use another loco to rerail the errant train onto tracks or drag locomotive sideways onto rails using a JCB.
8. Couple up brakevan
9. Away you go!
-
- Retired Director
- Posts: 3536
- Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 11:00 pm
-
- Trainee Fireman
- Posts: 142
- Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2007 6:08 pm
- Contact:
I'm more accustomed to a loco pulling wagons rather than pushing them, I was wondering about buffer lock negotiating the tight radius on the points of a passing loop?garratt100 wrote:Why would that be problematic...?alan2525 wrote:But then you'd have to push a rake of open wagons over the points...wouldn't that be problematic?
Chris
-
- Trainee Driver
- Posts: 826
- Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 4:22 pm
- Chris Cairns
- Driver
- Posts: 2366
- Joined: Mon Oct 29, 2007 7:25 pm
- Location: Glasgow, Scotland
It all depends on the type of wagons you are using Alan.
If it is Mamod wagons then forget propelling them, as they will tend to derail.
2 more solutions to your question.
1st - run the wagons with a Guards Van at each end. Solves your run round problem.
2nd - After running round and moving the Guards Van to the other end of your run round loop, using a wire sling on your loco to pull the Guards Van back into the loop and couple up to the rear (previously the front) of the wagons. This was a practice used in Scotland (and probably elsewhere) where wagons needed to be put into a single siding which had a facing point on the single main line.
If it is Mamod wagons then forget propelling them, as they will tend to derail.
2 more solutions to your question.
1st - run the wagons with a Guards Van at each end. Solves your run round problem.
2nd - After running round and moving the Guards Van to the other end of your run round loop, using a wire sling on your loco to pull the Guards Van back into the loop and couple up to the rear (previously the front) of the wagons. This was a practice used in Scotland (and probably elsewhere) where wagons needed to be put into a single siding which had a facing point on the single main line.
I think I prefer running with a guardsvan at each end. They do make for interesting models too! Interesting about the 2nd option, I never realised they did that!CCairns wrote:It all depends on the type of wagons you are using Alan.
If it is Mamod wagons then forget propelling them, as they will tend to derail.
2 more solutions to your question.
1st - run the wagons with a Guards Van at each end. Solves your run round problem.
2nd - After running round and moving the Guards Van to the other end of your run round loop, using a wire sling on your loco to pull the Guards Van back into the loop and couple up to the rear (previously the front) of the wagons. This was a practice used in Scotland (and probably elsewhere) where wagons needed to be put into a single siding which had a facing point on the single main line.
- PMQLR Board
- New User
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2008 8:14 pm
- Location: Glan-yr-Afon
Hello, as Senior Signalman of the PMLR (along with holding many other positions in siad railway) I couldn't help glancing at your dilemma. Simple answers:
Does your railway have any steep gradients - if not then is there any real need for the brakevan to be at the end of the train?
If it does have steep gradients that are continuous throughout, then the brakevan only needs to be at the bottom (down hill end). Failing that, if you want you could claim your stock is automatically braked - that way it dosn't matter where the brakevan is, the guard can control the whole train from that one spot where his air brake/vacuum setter is. However, buying the vac pipes from brandbright involves handing over money and they are rather unrealistic on small quarry wagons.
If you must have a braked vehicle at the end of the train, could you not have two brakevans - one at each end?
Or, more economically perhaps - a proper brakevan at one end, and a pointless 4-wheel brake vehicle at the other (my railway uses a vehicle similar to those employed on the DHR in India). Or maybe a spare fourwheel wagon thats braked - the FR, WHR, TR, Corris and other railways all have small four wheel wagons with hand brakes - the guard could ride in the wagon. Or if the train is short, the hand brake on the rear vehicle could be linked with the guards vehicle by string - I gather the FR use rope to enable one brakesman to operate several brakes at once on their gravity trains.
Or you could have a three road passing loop - they are a godsend but are costly and perhaps not worth the expense if full use is not made of them.
Or you could shunt as already suggested - if you adhear to either left or right hand running only, you can create a loop, which you can carry out the appropiate shunt in, without have to propel stock around any slight curve whatsoever, hence avoiding buffer lock.
However, I would be inclined to go with a red flag on the uphill end and a brake van on the downhill end, or two brake vehicles - or with large wagons - automatic braking.
As far as realistic practice goes - if its a small industrial railway, you can pretty much get away with anything.
If its a passenger/large railway - if its a freight train as long as it dosn't derail and general line operation is safe you can get away with anything. However, if passenger vehicles are involved this requires automatic braking - basically the coaches are always between the loco and wagons.
Anyway, theres my sermon for today.
lol
Does your railway have any steep gradients - if not then is there any real need for the brakevan to be at the end of the train?
If it does have steep gradients that are continuous throughout, then the brakevan only needs to be at the bottom (down hill end). Failing that, if you want you could claim your stock is automatically braked - that way it dosn't matter where the brakevan is, the guard can control the whole train from that one spot where his air brake/vacuum setter is. However, buying the vac pipes from brandbright involves handing over money and they are rather unrealistic on small quarry wagons.
If you must have a braked vehicle at the end of the train, could you not have two brakevans - one at each end?
Or, more economically perhaps - a proper brakevan at one end, and a pointless 4-wheel brake vehicle at the other (my railway uses a vehicle similar to those employed on the DHR in India). Or maybe a spare fourwheel wagon thats braked - the FR, WHR, TR, Corris and other railways all have small four wheel wagons with hand brakes - the guard could ride in the wagon. Or if the train is short, the hand brake on the rear vehicle could be linked with the guards vehicle by string - I gather the FR use rope to enable one brakesman to operate several brakes at once on their gravity trains.
Or you could have a three road passing loop - they are a godsend but are costly and perhaps not worth the expense if full use is not made of them.
Or you could shunt as already suggested - if you adhear to either left or right hand running only, you can create a loop, which you can carry out the appropiate shunt in, without have to propel stock around any slight curve whatsoever, hence avoiding buffer lock.
However, I would be inclined to go with a red flag on the uphill end and a brake van on the downhill end, or two brake vehicles - or with large wagons - automatic braking.
As far as realistic practice goes - if its a small industrial railway, you can pretty much get away with anything.
If its a passenger/large railway - if its a freight train as long as it dosn't derail and general line operation is safe you can get away with anything. However, if passenger vehicles are involved this requires automatic braking - basically the coaches are always between the loco and wagons.
Anyway, theres my sermon for today.
lol
H. Saville
Pen Morfa Light Railway Board
1918
Pen Morfa Light Railway Board
1918
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests