New IP Battery Loco
-
- Trainee Driver
- Posts: 792
- Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2008 11:01 pm
- Location: St. Helens & Porthmadog
- Contact:
New IP Battery Loco
I have just got off the phone to Ivan at IP about ways to fix my broken Jack and he mentioned to me that he is currently designing and trialling a new battery loco that will be able to output about 3/4 of a horsepower. Now for 16mm that sounds like a beast!
and whats more it will be in the same price range as Jack was!
He said if everything goes to plan it should be out for the Llanfair show.
Right, thats me saving up my money!
and whats more it will be in the same price range as Jack was!
He said if everything goes to plan it should be out for the Llanfair show.
Right, thats me saving up my money!
Thanks,
Paul Wood
MGLR
Paul Wood
MGLR
-
- Trainee Driver
- Posts: 792
- Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2008 11:01 pm
- Location: St. Helens & Porthmadog
- Contact:
from what he said I'd be suprised if its a funky Will.
He made it sound as though it would be mostly made from metal talking about going getting a new laser cutter just for the job.
Also he made it sound as though you can alter its performance saying that people could add as much weight to it as they liked to make it put down more power.
He made it sound as though it would be mostly made from metal talking about going getting a new laser cutter just for the job.
Also he made it sound as though you can alter its performance saying that people could add as much weight to it as they liked to make it put down more power.
Thanks,
Paul Wood
MGLR
Paul Wood
MGLR
- Pendo Pilot
- Driver
- Posts: 1897
- Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 12:24 am
- Location: South Staffordshire UK
- Contact:
- DolwyddelanLightRail
- Driver
- Posts: 2579
- Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 7:27 pm
- Location: Lost
With my mechanical engineering hat on, I reckon it must indeed 3/4 of a horsepower, scale of this would be something very small and power is something that dosn't really scale anyway. Would be a pretty big motor though (or more likely 2 motors)
"What the hell is that?"
"It's a model icebreaker sir."
"It's a bit big isn't it?"
"It's a full scale model sir....."
"It's a model icebreaker sir."
"It's a bit big isn't it?"
"It's a full scale model sir....."
-
- Trainee Driver
- Posts: 792
- Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2008 11:01 pm
- Location: St. Helens & Porthmadog
- Contact:
- Endless, Nameless
- Driver
- Posts: 1156
- Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2008 6:56 pm
- Location: Plymouth
-
- Trainee Driver
- Posts: 677
- Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 2:34 pm
I'm going to pen my thoughts. Feel free to debunk them.Endless, Nameless wrote:3/4 of a horsepower isn't that much really, well, not in real world terms. Horses aren't very efficient. It'll make for an impressive model though!
the modern take of a Horsepower is totally different from what was originally established. When we talk about Horsepower these days we aren't talking about the equivalent equine power!
3/4 HP is nominally around 560 watts. My 7 1/4 loco is fitted with twin 600 watt motors, and those are small but not small enough by a long way (they are about mamod loco size) for a 16mm loco so I'm also going on the basis that he's probably got twin motors or even three to get the power down.
Is there really any point to this though? I mean its not like we're trying to pull a person along. That much motor power will probably just not get used on a 16mm railway. Another factor is batteries, your going to need ample Ah (amp hours) to power all this, and if you have that much motor/drive where are the batteries going? We see battery locos (good ones) today that have one model boat motor type job (Como Drills!) and will pull bucket loads on that. I've seen LGB locos pull massive loads and I'm pretty certain they don't have 560 Watt motors. The largest motors MFAComoDrills do are 80 watt rated, and they are big lumps, my Dad's tug has one and its massive, too big for a "scale" loco.
Just as proof of point, my best mate built a semi scale London Transport tram in 3 1/2" gauge. 4 wheels, twin motor, one motor to an axle. He used these 80 watt motors (largest he could fit) and the tram pulls its driver around on 160 watts at 24 volt quite happily.
160 watts = 0.214563534 horsepower
560 watts = 0.75097237 horsepower
I'll be very interested in this project as it progresses and I'd love to be proved wrong, but it seems like a bit of a steam hammer to crack a nut so to speak.
Last edited by bessytractor on Tue Jun 22, 2010 2:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Trainee Driver
- Posts: 792
- Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2008 11:01 pm
- Location: St. Helens & Porthmadog
- Contact:
well LGB locos (the smaller ones) struggle to pull themselves up my railway so I need a powerful battery engine to be able to recover my dead steamer from the bottom of my line.
and from what he said you add your own weight to make it have better adhesion which is where most battery locos are going wrong. the only battery engine i have seen rival the strength of a steamer is the roundhouse cricieth castle and that weighs about the same as a steamer so i think its all in the weight.
and from what he said you add your own weight to make it have better adhesion which is where most battery locos are going wrong. the only battery engine i have seen rival the strength of a steamer is the roundhouse cricieth castle and that weighs about the same as a steamer so i think its all in the weight.
Thanks,
Paul Wood
MGLR
Paul Wood
MGLR
-
- Trainee Driver
- Posts: 677
- Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 2:34 pm
you can add as much weight as you like.
Doesn't make it a good thing however. If your designing a loco you should have a rough idea of what you want it to do and then build it to suit. Adding weight to a loco that wasn't necessarily designed for it is going to wear it out quicker, put excessive load on the transmission and heat up the electrics quicker due to the higher current draw from the motor, it does after all have to move itself to start with!
Doesn't make it a good thing however. If your designing a loco you should have a rough idea of what you want it to do and then build it to suit. Adding weight to a loco that wasn't necessarily designed for it is going to wear it out quicker, put excessive load on the transmission and heat up the electrics quicker due to the higher current draw from the motor, it does after all have to move itself to start with!
-
- Trainee Driver
- Posts: 792
- Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2008 11:01 pm
- Location: St. Helens & Porthmadog
- Contact:
- Endless, Nameless
- Driver
- Posts: 1156
- Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2008 6:56 pm
- Location: Plymouth
Really? Which ones? The "Otto" and the feldbahn locos are pretty feeble (realistically so in the case of the Feldbahn, and Otto is just a toy really) but the Stainz will pull a house down. Add a bit of weight and it'll pull down a mansion...MoelygestLR wrote:well LGB locos (the smaller ones) struggle to pull themselves up my railway
The weight issue depends on how well engineered (or perhaps over engineered) the engine is. On some engines, a bit of weight will kill it easily; I suspect IP's older engines fit into this category, as for that matter does the LGB Feldbahn loco I mentioned above.
The LGB Stainz, and certain other locos in the range, will easily cope with quite a significant amount of added weight. For those who read Garden Rail the Linz- Gstadt Bahn was featured a while back- steep switchback gradients with all LGB power, mostly weighted, pulling heavy trains. He certainly didn't find any problems caused by the added weight.
Criccieth Castle is also built on brick outhouse principles with a massively over engineered drivetrain; this means they can make it weigh a ton and hence it'll pull anything. Try the same with an Accy Baguley and watch those lightweight gears strip...
Matt
"The Ancient Greeks called it Pandora's box- but what they actually meant was Baldrick's Trousers"
"The Ancient Greeks called it Pandora's box- but what they actually meant was Baldrick's Trousers"
-
- Trainee Driver
- Posts: 792
- Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2008 11:01 pm
- Location: St. Helens & Porthmadog
- Contact:
Oh I agree about the gears bit by the way.
Well yes the stainz i have slips too much. So it can barely pull itself. I havent ran it in a long time as i dont have track power anymore. might consider selling it or maybe use the chassis under a different loco and convert to battery power. adding a bit of weight at the same time.
Well yes the stainz i have slips too much. So it can barely pull itself. I havent ran it in a long time as i dont have track power anymore. might consider selling it or maybe use the chassis under a different loco and convert to battery power. adding a bit of weight at the same time.
Thanks,
Paul Wood
MGLR
Paul Wood
MGLR
Iv spoken with Ivan at IP and what he told me about his new loco is comletley different from whats been told here.
Im not giving anything away though because it would be bad manners to betray his trust like that, but I will say expect pictures of this new loco to be released around christmas (well thats the target)
Im not giving anything away though because it would be bad manners to betray his trust like that, but I will say expect pictures of this new loco to be released around christmas (well thats the target)
A steam propelled life-style.
-
- Trainee Driver
- Posts: 792
- Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2008 11:01 pm
- Location: St. Helens & Porthmadog
- Contact:
when did you last speak to him?
I spoke to him about 2 weeks ago and he said Llanfair show was the targeted release date, bit of a difference there.
and he didnt say not to tell anyone. he didnt give too much away really. im looking foreward to finding out more about this beast though.
I spoke to him about 2 weeks ago and he said Llanfair show was the targeted release date, bit of a difference there.
and he didnt say not to tell anyone. he didnt give too much away really. im looking foreward to finding out more about this beast though.
Thanks,
Paul Wood
MGLR
Paul Wood
MGLR
several hours agoMoelygestLR wrote:when did you last speak to him?
I spoke to him about 2 weeks ago and he said Llanfair show was the targeted release date, bit of a difference there.
and he didnt say not to tell anyone. he didnt give too much away really. im looking foreward to finding out more about this beast though.
must be a different loco he was talking about, I told him a new and incredibley strong loco was rumoured and he told me something very different to what youv said.
oh goody 2 new locos
he didnt say not to tell anyone but if I was in his shoes I wouldnt want people Id told to go blabbing.
A steam propelled life-style.
- Endless, Nameless
- Driver
- Posts: 1156
- Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2008 6:56 pm
- Location: Plymouth
Regarding the Stainz- does it still have traction tyres (or a traction tyre), and does it have skates? The skates can stick, putting too much downwards force on the track and taking a larger share of the loco's weight (as opposed to just enough to keep them pressed on the track), reducing the weight over the wheels.
Check the skates are free, and try adding bit of weight. How old is it roughly- metal or plastic coupling rods/ valve gear?
Check the skates are free, and try adding bit of weight. How old is it roughly- metal or plastic coupling rods/ valve gear?
Matt
"The Ancient Greeks called it Pandora's box- but what they actually meant was Baldrick's Trousers"
"The Ancient Greeks called it Pandora's box- but what they actually meant was Baldrick's Trousers"
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests