Going to far
Going to far
I'm still getting bits for my 16mm indoor line and I am going to embrace radio control. So why not go for the ultimate I thought. If I use a Spektrum DX6 TX,which has a 10 model memory, surely I can fit battery powered receivers and servos under the layout and use r/c to control the points. I would only need 1 memory position to move up to 4 points I think. Loco's aren't a problem as I've had a fair stable of r/c cars and trucks in the past. I'm also familiar with the Spektrum.Never had a problem with 'em. Am I pushing the boat out too far do you think,or has it been done.
Lead me not into temptation,for I can find my own way.
-
- Driver
- Posts: 4650
- Joined: Wed Dec 30, 2009 2:27 pm
- Location: Forgotten Realms
- Contact:
- Pendo Pilot
- Driver
- Posts: 1897
- Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 12:24 am
- Location: South Staffordshire UK
- Contact:
I thought the same a while back using an old Hi-Tec RC helicopter TX with 10 model memory. Then realised that the memory bit only actually adjusted the trim states & axis controls rather than having ten seperate RX's running off it. Not familier with the TX you are talking about so don't know how that differs but I expect with 2.4ghz it means ten differently tuned in RX's ?
I would love to go with the air system, but cost is putting me off on that one..
I would love to go with the air system, but cost is putting me off on that one..
Tommy Dodd may have an ARS key but I have a TASS button & a Rope Ladder, just like pirates, except the TASS button bit.
Going too far
I don't think cost is a major issue. If you consider DCC, then I think we get a better deal. The Spektrum has a 10 model memory and 6 channels. Therefore, one 6 channel receiver should be able to fire 6 points. An aircraft Transmitter has 2 sticks so, again,1 loco can run on one stick and another on the other stick. Bingo. 2 loco's independently controlled on the same track. What fun. You can't do that with track powered loco's. All you have to do is select which loco you want to run. How to mad without trying.cost is putting me off on that one..
Lead me not into temptation,for I can find my own way.
It also depends on the complexity of your layout. Remember that on the real thing one point lever (or switch) can control more than one point end. Both ends of a crossover usually work off the same lever for example, and so would a siding point and its associated trap. Remember too that some points (IE in your loco or goods yards) are only going to be used for low speed shunting moves so would probably be better off hand operated anyway- what use is the "long arm" when you have to be standing next to the point to supervise attatching or detatching?
Well, now we know the buffer-stops work! (Heard at 2013 "Longest Day" solstice steamup)
- tom_tom_go
- Driver
- Posts: 4824
- Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2011 3:08 am
- Location: Kent, UK
- Contact:
Have a look at what I am doing regarding points and get in touch if you are interested as I think this would be idea for your layout mate:
http://gardenrails.myfreeforum.org/abou ... ght=points
Cheers,
Tom
http://gardenrails.myfreeforum.org/abou ... ght=points
Cheers,
Tom
Going to far
Fulgarex motors are god value.Used several in various scales and gauges. Never outside though. I would suggest sealing the covers with sealant to prevent crud from getting into the gears. I've also been looking at alternative systems. All a Loco has to do is go backwards and forwards. Hopefully with fine control. Battery loco's of course. That's it. What about using ESC's from the marine world. They should also be fairly weather proof as well I'm thinking. And a lot cheaper than dedicated jobs.
Lead me not into temptation,for I can find my own way.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests