Ugly locomotives

Anything related to the garden railway world that is not catered for in another board
User avatar
philipy
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 5964
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 3:00 pm
Location: South Northants

Re: Marc Horovitz is Wrong. (IMO)

Post by philipy »

drewzero1 wrote: Mon Nov 27, 2023 3:06 pm did indeed find a book by that name, author Ernest F Carter. There are a few copies for sale online--
EF Carter was a well known author back in the 1950's. I'm sure I inherited a couple of his books from my dad, but no dea where they went to.
Philip
User avatar
dudeface
Fireman
Fireman
Posts: 402
Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2023 3:35 am
Location: Southern Wisconsin
Contact:

Re: Marc Horovitz is Wrong. (IMO)

Post by dudeface »

ge_rik wrote: Mon Nov 27, 2023 8:45 am One advantage of modelling so-called ugly locos might be that they are a lot easier to build, as in this case ....


c6c2000889eb35a411f3bf6949c16592--equestrian-goats.jpg
Well somebody's gotta do it! Almost looks like a converted caboose?
Miles-- Trains are fun. With the exception of track power. Argh!

Big Maple & Little Oak RR
User avatar
GAP
Trainee Driver
Trainee Driver
Posts: 872
Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2012 10:34 pm
Location: Bundaberg QLD Australia
Contact:

Re: Marc Horovitz is Wrong. (IMO)

Post by GAP »

dudeface wrote: Mon Nov 27, 2023 12:56 am
drewzero1 wrote: Sun Nov 26, 2023 2:53 am I can only imagine some ungainly logging train:
Screenshot_20231125-204850.jpg
The more I look at it the more horrendous it looks. But no less interesting and I would still like to see a model of it! :?
Bit like this one at Mt Washington Cog Railway but the other way round.
mount-washington-cog-railway-i-william-dickman.jpg
mount-washington-cog-railway-i-william-dickman.jpg (238.82 KiB) Viewed 35801 times
Graeme
From the home of the Uppen Down Railway
https://ringbalin-light-railway.blogspo ... -page.html
User avatar
dudeface
Fireman
Fireman
Posts: 402
Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2023 3:35 am
Location: Southern Wisconsin
Contact:

Re: Marc Horovitz is Wrong. (IMO)

Post by dudeface »

That's what I was thinking, I wonder why that was done, maybe it was to improve draft or something?
Miles-- Trains are fun. With the exception of track power. Argh!

Big Maple & Little Oak RR
User avatar
GAP
Trainee Driver
Trainee Driver
Posts: 872
Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2012 10:34 pm
Location: Bundaberg QLD Australia
Contact:

Re: Marc Horovitz is Wrong. (IMO)

Post by GAP »

dudeface wrote: Mon Nov 27, 2023 10:04 pm That's what I was thinking, I wonder why that was done, maybe it was to improve draft or something?
To keep the water in the boiler level or covering the firebox.
Graeme
From the home of the Uppen Down Railway
https://ringbalin-light-railway.blogspo ... -page.html
User avatar
dudeface
Fireman
Fireman
Posts: 402
Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2023 3:35 am
Location: Southern Wisconsin
Contact:

Re: Marc Horovitz is Wrong. (IMO)

Post by dudeface »

GAP wrote: Tue Nov 28, 2023 10:03 am
dudeface wrote: Mon Nov 27, 2023 10:04 pm That's what I was thinking, I wonder why that was done, maybe it was to improve draft or something?
To keep the water in the boiler level or covering the firebox.
I know why it was done on the cog railways, I meant the pole road loco.
Miles-- Trains are fun. With the exception of track power. Argh!

Big Maple & Little Oak RR
User avatar
drewzero1
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 840
Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2023 4:35 pm
Location: WI, US
Contact:

Re: Marc Horovitz is Wrong. (IMO)

Post by drewzero1 »

On the thread where I found it, someone suggested it was indeed to improve draft, and also that it was an odd feature on something that wasn't a rack loco. I have seen a particular make of traction engines use the same kind of slanted boiler, can't remember which it was though.
User avatar
dudeface
Fireman
Fireman
Posts: 402
Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2023 3:35 am
Location: Southern Wisconsin
Contact:

Re: Marc Horovitz is Wrong. (IMO)

Post by dudeface »

One of these? I can't seem to find anything that says what it is.
steam-rollers.jpg
steam-rollers.jpg (428.97 KiB) Viewed 35715 times
It looks like it has a builders plate on the side but between the photo quality and those pipes I can't read it. ? ltd., ?, Basingstoke, England I think.

Edit: Never mind, that would be the company that owned it. No hope at all of reading the plate on the smokebox door.
Miles-- Trains are fun. With the exception of track power. Argh!

Big Maple & Little Oak RR
User avatar
drewzero1
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 840
Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2023 4:35 pm
Location: WI, US
Contact:

Re: Marc Horovitz is Wrong. (IMO)

Post by drewzero1 »

Yes, it appears to be a Wallis & Stevens 'Simplicity' road roller, just what I was apparently thinking of. Seems like a nice compact unit with the slant boiler, maybe a distant ancestor to the space-saving SAAB slant-four? :lol:
User avatar
dudeface
Fireman
Fireman
Posts: 402
Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2023 3:35 am
Location: Southern Wisconsin
Contact:

Re: Marc Horovitz is Wrong. (IMO)

Post by dudeface »

So was I right then about the plate on the side being the builder?
Miles-- Trains are fun. With the exception of track power. Argh!

Big Maple & Little Oak RR
User avatar
philipy
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 5964
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 3:00 pm
Location: South Northants

Re: Marc Horovitz is Wrong. (IMO)

Post by philipy »

dudeface wrote: Wed Nov 29, 2023 2:25 pm So was I right then about the plate on the side being the builder?
Yes.
This link shows a very similar plate. Same wording but rectangular rather than lozenge shape.
https://www.alamy.com/stock-photo-sign- ... 05474.html
Philip
User avatar
dudeface
Fireman
Fireman
Posts: 402
Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2023 3:35 am
Location: Southern Wisconsin
Contact:

Re: Marc Horovitz is Wrong. (IMO)

Post by dudeface »

I see. It didn't look like any builders plate I've seen before.
Miles-- Trains are fun. With the exception of track power. Argh!

Big Maple & Little Oak RR
User avatar
philipy
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 5964
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 3:00 pm
Location: South Northants

Re: Marc Horovitz is Wrong. (IMO)

Post by philipy »

Wallis & Steevens were primarily agricultural machinery and traction engine manufacturers, not railway engine builders, thats probably why you've not come across them before.
Philip
User avatar
dudeface
Fireman
Fireman
Posts: 402
Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2023 3:35 am
Location: Southern Wisconsin
Contact:

Re: Marc Horovitz is Wrong. (IMO)

Post by dudeface »

philipy wrote: Wed Nov 29, 2023 4:16 pm Wallis & Steevens were primarily agricultural machinery and traction engine manufacturers, not railway engine builders, thats probably why you've not come across them before.
I've heard of them, as I'm also interested in traction engines, as well as really anything that moves. I just didn't put the two together.
Miles-- Trains are fun. With the exception of track power. Argh!

Big Maple & Little Oak RR
User avatar
dudeface
Fireman
Fireman
Posts: 402
Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2023 3:35 am
Location: Southern Wisconsin
Contact:

Re: Marc Horovitz is Wrong. (IMO)

Post by dudeface »

This thread now has over 1000 views! Boing?! :shock:
Miles-- Trains are fun. With the exception of track power. Argh!

Big Maple & Little Oak RR
User avatar
Peter Butler
Driver
Driver
Posts: 5689
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2012 10:33 pm
Location: West Wales

Re: Marc Horovitz is Wrong. (IMO)

Post by Peter Butler »

Surely this loco would keep Marc awake at night?...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7gE8XLQ44_E
The best things in life are free.... so why am I doing this?
User avatar
philipy
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 5964
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 3:00 pm
Location: South Northants

Re: Marc Horovitz is Wrong. (IMO)

Post by philipy »

I like that one Peter :lol:

This clip turned up next and I do rather like the other one as well.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Npk6RFkM7fU
Philip
User avatar
Peter Butler
Driver
Driver
Posts: 5689
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2012 10:33 pm
Location: West Wales

Re: Marc Horovitz is Wrong. (IMO)

Post by Peter Butler »

They are both interesting but I think the wooden cab loco is possibly the one I would choose to model. My list is growing longer every day!!!
The best things in life are free.... so why am I doing this?
User avatar
drewzero1
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 840
Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2023 4:35 pm
Location: WI, US
Contact:

Re: Marc Horovitz is Wrong. (IMO)

Post by drewzero1 »

Wow, I thought to post one of those as my first suggestion, but thought they looked too normal! Maybe I've just been reading too much of Boulton's Siding and am getting desensitized to ugly locos?
Isaac Watts Boulton's "Rattlesnake"
Isaac Watts Boulton's "Rattlesnake"
971-Trehowell-Colliery-Isaac-Boulton-0-4-0TG-Rattlesnake.jpg.5ce17c3b3026a95672350264449a36f1.jpg (128.19 KiB) Viewed 35330 times
User avatar
dudeface
Fireman
Fireman
Posts: 402
Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2023 3:35 am
Location: Southern Wisconsin
Contact:

Re: Marc Horovitz is Wrong. (IMO)

Post by dudeface »

philipy wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2023 1:06 pm I like that one Peter :lol:

This clip turned up next and I do rather like the other one as well.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Npk6RFkM7fU
That one's a Falk, Marc reviewed a model of one by Wuhu here. https://www.trains.com/grw/news-reviews ... ocomotive/

I think he would actually like these, he likes to model unusual locomotives, so I wouldn't exactly expect him to call a locomotive hideous, but people's brains work in strange ways... :dontknow:
wp_ss_20231109_0007.png
wp_ss_20231109_0007.png (1.48 MiB) Viewed 35319 times
Miles-- Trains are fun. With the exception of track power. Argh!

Big Maple & Little Oak RR
Post Reply