Brunel was about 5' 4" so yeah.....he IS in scale for 16mm!Chris Cairns:104009 wrote:Picked up one of Rob Bennett's 'Brunel' figures at the recent Llanfair show.
As you can see he is not 16mm scale being taller scalewise than his actual 5' height.
The other figure was a clearout from Modeltown - probably an ex-display 7/8ths figure as he still has glue on the bottom of his boots.
Chris Cairns
Started running-in Brunel!
Re: Busy Bodies 'Brunel' Figure
-
- Trainee Fireman
- Posts: 110
- Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 8:41 pm
- Location: North Worcestershire.
- Contact:
Hello S.A., I am afraid the locomotive is suffering a slight case of 'engineering limbo' at the moment! I am trying to get a small back-log of jobs completed and I am nearly done, The part of the conversion I have done to date I am very pleased with. I cannot continue the running in as half of the engine is off and the engine tips up very easy....
- Chris Cairns
- Driver
- Posts: 2364
- Joined: Mon Oct 29, 2007 7:25 pm
- Location: Glasgow, Scotland
I've very kindly been sent a modified Brunel lubricator (has a continuous steam pipe with a drilled 0.5mm hole) by Mike Wakefield to retrofit to my poorly Brunel.
Currently do not have workshop time available to disassemble my Brunel to attend to this, but worth pointing out that the drain plug used by Mamod does project into the open void of the brass block thus reducing the overall capacity. Currently my Brunel will only run for so long before stopping, and only after refilling the lubricator will it start running again.
What grade of oil do people use in their Brunel's? Mamod supply 460 steam oil, but in conjunction with my better running experience on other Mamod/MSS's I've converted to Roundhouse 220 steam oil.
Chris Cairns
Currently do not have workshop time available to disassemble my Brunel to attend to this, but worth pointing out that the drain plug used by Mamod does project into the open void of the brass block thus reducing the overall capacity. Currently my Brunel will only run for so long before stopping, and only after refilling the lubricator will it start running again.
What grade of oil do people use in their Brunel's? Mamod supply 460 steam oil, but in conjunction with my better running experience on other Mamod/MSS's I've converted to Roundhouse 220 steam oil.
Chris Cairns
-
- Trainee Fireman
- Posts: 110
- Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 8:41 pm
- Location: North Worcestershire.
- Contact:
- mikewakefielduk@btinterne
- Fireman
- Posts: 309
- Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2012 1:43 pm
- Location: Shropshire
If you're a member of the 16mm NGM you'd have probably read the Brunel article in the latest (the delayed August 2014) 16mm Today.
I read Dave Kirby's article over the weekend so this morning decided to have a go at a few of the alterations he'd detailed as my Brunel, despite behaving impeccably all summer, had proved a bit difficult to get good steam pressure the last couple of outings.
Dave Kirby listed the changes he'd made to improve steaming. In essence these are:
1)Further elongate the mounting hole to centralise the burner under the boiler.
2)Lower the burner by about 5mm until it almost touches the axle.
3)Raise the boiler by about 5mm by fitting spacers under the boiler mounting (and using longer screws).
Now his track appears to be 45mm and mine is 32mm so I found his improvements 1) and 2) were impossible on my Brunel as the burner would foul the wheels.
Which left improvement 3). I first studied the photos accompanying his article. In doing so I realised that as the boiler is simply clamped to its mounting all you need to do is slacken the clamp, put spacers around the clamp's circumference to raise it a small amount (I used 6BA brass nuts), replace the boiler so its sitting on top of the nuts and finally re-tighten the clamp. You don't need to fit spacers under the clamp at all.
The result: I was able to turn the gas up further before the flames start to lift. I easily reached 40 psi and the loco ran well. Unfortunately only on the rolling road so far as the weather outside is decidedly grim.
Mike
I read Dave Kirby's article over the weekend so this morning decided to have a go at a few of the alterations he'd detailed as my Brunel, despite behaving impeccably all summer, had proved a bit difficult to get good steam pressure the last couple of outings.
Dave Kirby listed the changes he'd made to improve steaming. In essence these are:
1)Further elongate the mounting hole to centralise the burner under the boiler.
2)Lower the burner by about 5mm until it almost touches the axle.
3)Raise the boiler by about 5mm by fitting spacers under the boiler mounting (and using longer screws).
Now his track appears to be 45mm and mine is 32mm so I found his improvements 1) and 2) were impossible on my Brunel as the burner would foul the wheels.
Which left improvement 3). I first studied the photos accompanying his article. In doing so I realised that as the boiler is simply clamped to its mounting all you need to do is slacken the clamp, put spacers around the clamp's circumference to raise it a small amount (I used 6BA brass nuts), replace the boiler so its sitting on top of the nuts and finally re-tighten the clamp. You don't need to fit spacers under the clamp at all.
The result: I was able to turn the gas up further before the flames start to lift. I easily reached 40 psi and the loco ran well. Unfortunately only on the rolling road so far as the weather outside is decidedly grim.
Mike
Last edited by mikewakefielduk@btinterne on Tue Oct 14, 2014 10:00 am, edited 1 time in total.
- mikewakefielduk@btinterne
- Fireman
- Posts: 309
- Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2012 1:43 pm
- Location: Shropshire
I'm not the first to suggest this easy fix. Back in the May 2013 edition of 16mm Today Peter Aldridge did exactly the same thing as me - place some nuts to act as spacers under the boiler and the burner behaves a lot better.
I don't recall having read the 2013 article before today and that particular edition of 16mm Today of mine looks awfully pristine - none of the usual coffee stains and oily fingermarks - so perhaps I didn't read it in detail back then. May last year was a particular hectic period.
Anyway, if you have a copy of the article I urge you to read it. The photos were taken on The Portland Light Railway where I've also run my Brunel, and I can confirm it tackles the whole track, including the spiral, with ease.
Mike
I don't recall having read the 2013 article before today and that particular edition of 16mm Today of mine looks awfully pristine - none of the usual coffee stains and oily fingermarks - so perhaps I didn't read it in detail back then. May last year was a particular hectic period.
Anyway, if you have a copy of the article I urge you to read it. The photos were taken on The Portland Light Railway where I've also run my Brunel, and I can confirm it tackles the whole track, including the spiral, with ease.
Mike
- Chris Cairns
- Driver
- Posts: 2364
- Joined: Mon Oct 29, 2007 7:25 pm
- Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Just re-read the May 2013 article, plus the August 2014 article, and got my Brunel out of storage for some measurements.
Looks like we have had another Mamod 'improvement' which means, as Mike has already pointed out, Dave Birkby's modifications will not work on other versions.
Both those articles refer to what I call the Mark I Version 3 Brunel. Mine is the Mark I Version 2 which has the different axles and the longer air slots in the chassis.
My burner is 33mm diameter so it is impossible for that to fit between the 28mm back to back wheels whilst running in 32mm. Measured the gap between the burner and the axle as 70 thou (1.78mm) so not much adjustment there, but there is already a spacer fitted between the burner & the running plate. And just to add 'insult to injury' I have 2 different length of screws holding the boiler clamp to the running plate so 2 of those would need replacing to allow the clamp/boiler to be raised above the running plate.
Certainly some 'food for thought' when I get the workshop time available to fit the modified lubricator, and will probably be rotating the boiler around as well.
Chris Cairns
Looks like we have had another Mamod 'improvement' which means, as Mike has already pointed out, Dave Birkby's modifications will not work on other versions.
Both those articles refer to what I call the Mark I Version 3 Brunel. Mine is the Mark I Version 2 which has the different axles and the longer air slots in the chassis.
My burner is 33mm diameter so it is impossible for that to fit between the 28mm back to back wheels whilst running in 32mm. Measured the gap between the burner and the axle as 70 thou (1.78mm) so not much adjustment there, but there is already a spacer fitted between the burner & the running plate. And just to add 'insult to injury' I have 2 different length of screws holding the boiler clamp to the running plate so 2 of those would need replacing to allow the clamp/boiler to be raised above the running plate.
Certainly some 'food for thought' when I get the workshop time available to fit the modified lubricator, and will probably be rotating the boiler around as well.
Chris Cairns
-
- Trainee Fireman
- Posts: 110
- Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 8:41 pm
- Location: North Worcestershire.
- Contact:
I tried the BA nuts under my Mark one Brunel boiler though I did not notice any improvement to the flame. The Brunel that I am currently converting to 7/8" scale is the Mark 2 version with the burner right in the centre of the boiler. As a result of this there is no longer a slot provided for owners to move the burner over! I painted calibrations on the gas control nob and the regulator housing for fine control. In the current issue of SMT if you look closely at the photo's of what the 'Brunel' owner has done I believe he has directed the exhaust pipe DIRECTLY to the chimney area for steam effects. Judging what comes out of my exhaust pipe I wonder what state his burner wicks are in with all the waste condense that comes out of this pipe?!!........
- mikewakefielduk@btinterne
- Fireman
- Posts: 309
- Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2012 1:43 pm
- Location: Shropshire
As we are all aware, Mamod have a policy of "continuous improvement" which has resulted in many tweaks to the Brunel since it was first launched.
From talking to Mamod I understand the latest Brunel now has a lower centre of gravity (boiler body shorter in height, thicker side frames, lower cylinder, etc) but there's been relatively little change to the burner.
Bill, any chance of a photo or two of the underside of your new Brunel so we can see how the burner has been positioned under the centre of the boiler?
Mike
From talking to Mamod I understand the latest Brunel now has a lower centre of gravity (boiler body shorter in height, thicker side frames, lower cylinder, etc) but there's been relatively little change to the burner.
Bill, any chance of a photo or two of the underside of your new Brunel so we can see how the burner has been positioned under the centre of the boiler?
Mike
- mikewakefielduk@btinterne
- Fireman
- Posts: 309
- Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2012 1:43 pm
- Location: Shropshire
They have consistently been improved and now are more stable with both the lower centre of gravity and the 4:1 gearing, so the loco you bought in Llanfair is likely to be a good 'un.I´m beginning to wonder what Brunel I actually received. I bought it at Llanfair 2014 on a whim.
However, the numerous small improvements since the Brunel's launch means anything you read in an article may or may not apply to your own loco. Which says something considering how simple they are.
Mike
Last edited by mikewakefielduk@btinterne on Wed Oct 15, 2014 10:04 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Trainee Fireman
- Posts: 110
- Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 8:41 pm
- Location: North Worcestershire.
- Contact:
- Chris Cairns
- Driver
- Posts: 2364
- Joined: Mon Oct 29, 2007 7:25 pm
- Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Should be the current Mark II then, as they were close to selling the last Mark I's after the Peterborough show earlier in the year.kandnwlr wrote:I bought it a Llanfair 2014 on a whim.
Must admit I did not look too closely at the Brunel displayed on the Llanfair stand (my focus being on the Thomas Telford), and when David Terry asked me if I was going to upgrade my Brunel to the Mark II standard, as Mike Wakefield has done, I explained that it would be even more expensive as mine has the earlier style of dual gauge axles which are not compatible with the Mark II gearing.
I've been generally disappointed with the go then stop running of my Brunel (similar to the original running of my William & William II), and I'm hopeful the modified lubricator is the solution having already applied other tweaks.
Chris Cairns
-
- Trainee Fireman
- Posts: 110
- Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 8:41 pm
- Location: North Worcestershire.
- Contact:
- mikewakefielduk@btinterne
- Fireman
- Posts: 309
- Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2012 1:43 pm
- Location: Shropshire
Thanks for that Bill. As you can see, if I arrange my Brunel in the same way as your photo, my burner appears to be just about where yours is.
Which still leaves open the question of how Dave Kirby in his article managed to centralise his burner under the boiler without it fouling the wheels. As we're told his line is 32mm the only way I can think he's done it is to have a different shaped burner.
I suppose the sensible thing would be to email him and ask rather than speculate.
Mike
Which still leaves open the question of how Dave Kirby in his article managed to centralise his burner under the boiler without it fouling the wheels. As we're told his line is 32mm the only way I can think he's done it is to have a different shaped burner.
I suppose the sensible thing would be to email him and ask rather than speculate.
Mike
-
- Trainee Fireman
- Posts: 110
- Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 8:41 pm
- Location: North Worcestershire.
- Contact:
Way back in the first message of this epic I asked about the exhaust pipe on my Brunel and that it appeared a loose fit. You....Mike suggested soldering the pipe in. Soldering is no problem with me but I am not sure about soldering Copper pipe to Brass and what flux to use. I also don't want any problems with the engine block caused by the gas gun HEAT for heating the joint. I am currently debating adding a 'steadying' bracket to hold the pipe rigid and using Milliput to seal the join of the engine block/exhaust join. There is now a tight fit of the exhaust pipe as the pipe has another route to travel....to a on board condenser....
- mikewakefielduk@btinterne
- Fireman
- Posts: 309
- Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2012 1:43 pm
- Location: Shropshire
Although I used solder to hold the exhaust steam pipe to the cylinder block, the joint doesn't have to be steam tight so you could use some sort of sealant instead or even tap a thread in the block and screw in some kind of union.
I took the cylinder block off when I soldered my steam pipe in place. Common multi-core soft solder will do, you don't need silver solder.
and yes, a bracket is a good idea.
Mike
I took the cylinder block off when I soldered my steam pipe in place. Common multi-core soft solder will do, you don't need silver solder.
and yes, a bracket is a good idea.
Mike
- Chris Cairns
- Driver
- Posts: 2364
- Joined: Mon Oct 29, 2007 7:25 pm
- Location: Glasgow, Scotland
On my William II & Brunel piston valve blocks I soft soldered a brass screw into the 2nd exhaust hole to block them. The exhaust tubing that Mamod supplied for my Brunel is a tight fit but I am also considering the use of a condenser/oil trap.
I'd be wary of tapping a thread and fitting something into the exhaust hole. Alan Dunster (the original Mr Dream Steam) tried that with a Mamod Golden Jubilee but the resultant exhaust back pressure caused some poor running - presumably a factor of the internal diameter/bore of the fitting/tubing being used.
Chris Cairns
I'd be wary of tapping a thread and fitting something into the exhaust hole. Alan Dunster (the original Mr Dream Steam) tried that with a Mamod Golden Jubilee but the resultant exhaust back pressure caused some poor running - presumably a factor of the internal diameter/bore of the fitting/tubing being used.
Chris Cairns
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests