Changing of a Roundhouse Silver Lady - Steamy Clare

Discussion of Live Steam locomotives should be located here
User avatar
Annie
Fireman
Fireman
Posts: 471
Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2012 4:45 pm
Location: New Zealand

Post by Annie » Fri Oct 12, 2012 9:51 am

On New Zealand timber tramways loco crews would hang old sacks and even pieces of corrugated iron on the outside of a cab doorway to turn the prevailing wind and weather. I think hanging the canvas outside looks more logical and if it was raining it would prevent water dripping inside the cab.

As to toolboxes I think loco crews would fit them up wherever they could find a place to put them that they wouldn't fall over, but was still handy to get to.
What has Reality done for you lately?

spooner
Fireman
Fireman
Posts: 358
Joined: Sat May 01, 2010 12:21 pm
Location: Woodston,Peterborough

Post by spooner » Fri Oct 12, 2012 9:57 am

I would put rolled up blind (rag) on over side.
Keep up the good work.
Ian
WLR

User avatar
tom_tom_go
Driver
Driver
Posts: 4824
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2011 3:08 am
Location: Kent, UK
Contact:

Post by tom_tom_go » Fri Oct 12, 2012 5:40 pm

Thanks for the comments guys. A rug tied up on the other side will look good. Still not sure about the toolbox, would it not get in the way of the fire grate? (on the real thing that is)

I dyed the piece of cloth some more with coffee and it looks more worn now:

Image

User avatar
laalratty
Retired Director
Retired Director
Posts: 3887
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 5:35 pm
Location: Morecambe

Post by laalratty » Fri Oct 12, 2012 8:35 pm

I fear your toolbox would block access to the ashpan and therefore prevent it being ashed out easily. Also, muck from the footplate would probably run straight into it. Best way of hiding the drain screw is probably painting it with some black paint. Or maybe put something like a steam brake cylinder over it, they are sometimes found under the cab. The sheet over the cab side is quite prototypical though, I've seen pics of them on Isle of Man locos for a start
"What the hell is that?"
"It's a model icebreaker sir."
"It's a bit big isn't it?"
"It's a full scale model sir....."

User avatar
Annie
Fireman
Fireman
Posts: 471
Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2012 4:45 pm
Location: New Zealand

Post by Annie » Sat Oct 13, 2012 12:31 am

Oops, I forgot about access to the ashpan :oops: Yes a brake cylinder would make more sense to have in that position.
What has Reality done for you lately?

User avatar
GTB
Driver
Driver
Posts: 1559
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2011 2:46 pm
Location: Australia

Post by GTB » Sat Oct 13, 2012 10:05 am

tom_tom_go:75751 wrote:  A rug tied up on the other side will look good.
Apart from a rolled up tarpaulin on the other side, the one that is down needs to be tied off, otherwise it will just flap around in the wind.

In terms of hiding the lubricator drain, just paint it black and mount the lubricator a bit higher so it doesn't protrude as far.

The drain plug is a pain to use at the best of times (especially when hot), so it's best not to restrict access to it any more than you have to......

Graeme

User avatar
tom_tom_go
Driver
Driver
Posts: 4824
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2011 3:08 am
Location: Kent, UK
Contact:

Post by tom_tom_go » Sat Oct 13, 2012 11:15 am

Thanks for the additional comments.

If I decide to add a steam brake cylinder do I then have to model vacuum braking on the train and wagons or could this just be used for braking on the loco only? I decided a while back I did not want to model vacuum braking as it's just another detail to buy, paint, etc!

My knowledge in this area is very poor so if someone could enlighten me please? :)

User avatar
tom_tom_go
Driver
Driver
Posts: 4824
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2011 3:08 am
Location: Kent, UK
Contact:

Post by tom_tom_go » Sat Oct 13, 2012 11:25 am

Just found this picture of a cylinder under the cab?

Image

Also, I have this chassis of a diesel loco that I hope to one day build into something and I think this has been modeled with a brake cylinder although not steam powered:

Image

User avatar
GTB
Driver
Driver
Posts: 1559
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2011 2:46 pm
Location: Australia

Post by GTB » Sat Oct 13, 2012 12:07 pm

tom_tom_go:75766 wrote: If I decide to add a steam brake cylinder do I then have to model vacuum braking on the train and wagons or could this just be used for braking on the loco only?
As a generalisation.........

Loco and train brake are independent of each other. A vacuum brake fitted loco would have a steam brake on the loco, which had a smaller cylinder than the rolling stock, as it worked on steam pressure.

Locos without continuous brakes would have either a steam brake if fairly modern, or just a handbrake on the old ones.

Air brakes on a loco are also small cylinders, but they have an air tank and a pump somewhere on the loco.

These links give an overview of vacuum brake systems and air brake systems.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vacuum_brake
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Railway_air_brake

Graeme

User avatar
tom_tom_go
Driver
Driver
Posts: 4824
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2011 3:08 am
Location: Kent, UK
Contact:

Post by tom_tom_go » Sat Oct 13, 2012 2:24 pm

Thanks Graeme :)

User avatar
tom_tom_go
Driver
Driver
Posts: 4824
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2011 3:08 am
Location: Kent, UK
Contact:

Post by tom_tom_go » Thu Nov 01, 2012 4:20 pm

I think the RH toolbox hides the bolt that screws in front of the smoke box well (just needed a hole drilled under the toolbox to fit over the top of it) :)

Image

User avatar
Keith S
Driver
Driver
Posts: 1627
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2011 11:44 pm
Location: Canada

Post by Keith S » Thu Nov 01, 2012 5:13 pm

Your engine is looking very nice, however I find the bare metal edge where you have cut back the front buffer beam to be noticeable. Touching this up with some red paint would look nice.

User avatar
tom_tom_go
Driver
Driver
Posts: 4824
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2011 3:08 am
Location: Kent, UK
Contact:

Post by tom_tom_go » Fri Nov 02, 2012 8:42 am

I agree Keith and it is on my long list of painting jobs still left to do on this loco :?

User avatar
IrishPeter
Driver
Driver
Posts: 1400
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2011 3:24 am
Location: 'Boro, VA

Post by IrishPeter » Fri Nov 02, 2012 3:13 pm

Usual kit on the Isle of Man and Manx Northern Railway, besides fire irons was:

Tool box - fireman's side (L/H) tank top on the early locomotives; not carried after about 1905.

Rerailing jack - again tank top - right side as the locos are driven from the right, and unlike the tool box it was not too much of an obstruction.. Generally speaking one is looking well ahead so driver on right signals on the left is not a problem. A few are sited on the wrong side to help sighting!

South line locomotives had a small canvas dodger to fill part of the opening in the uper part of the cab.  North line engines also had a wooden board to jam in the opening between the rear of the tank and the coal bunker for when it was raining and blowing a gale.  They also had a large canvas draught dodger that filled most of the upper part of the cab opening.

I have seen a photo of 'Cale' with the whole of the cab opening on the fireman's side closed in with canvas dodgers and a wooden board in the door.  The photo was taken during the big snow of 1895 and she was the lead loco in a three engine snow clearing effort!  As the line only had four locomotives that tells yer somehink.

Peter in AZ
Traffic Pattern? What pattern? Spuds out; grain in, but cattle, sheep and passengers are a lot less predictable.

User avatar
tom_tom_go
Driver
Driver
Posts: 4824
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2011 3:08 am
Location: Kent, UK
Contact:

Post by tom_tom_go » Sun Nov 04, 2012 1:04 pm

Thanks Peter.

Graeme, here are the pics of the modified coupler you wanted (sorry it took so long!)

Image

User avatar
TonyW
Driver
Driver
Posts: 1357
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 9:25 am
Location: North Wales
Contact:

Post by TonyW » Sun Nov 04, 2012 4:31 pm

GTB:75769 wrote:Loco and train brake are independent of each other. A vacuum brake fitted loco would have a steam brake on the loco, which had a smaller cylinder than the rolling stock, as it worked on steam pressure.
While that is generally true, there are a lot of locos that used vacuum on the loco and had no steam brake. This arrangement was used on the standard gauge by some GWR (all?) and LNER locos, and is also used on NGG16 Garratts.

On an NGG16 no vacuum means no brakes (other than the hard-to-use handbrake). The loco brakes can be applied independently of the train brake, i.e. a train can stand in a station with the carriage brakes off and the loco brakes on.
Tony Willmore
Rhos Helyg Locomotive Works: http://www.rhoshelyg.me.uk
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/RhosHelygLocoWorks

User avatar
plewsy2105
Fireman
Fireman
Posts: 251
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 7:28 pm
Location: home

Post by plewsy2105 » Sun Nov 04, 2012 7:34 pm

While that is generally true, there are a lot of locos that used vacuum on the loco and had no steam brake. This arrangement was used on the standard gauge by some GWR (all?) and LNER locos, and is also used on NGG16 Garratts.
and some southern locos i.e the Lord Nelson class and the schools class
plewsy2105

MHR apprentice fitter

User avatar
Annie
Fireman
Fireman
Posts: 471
Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2012 4:45 pm
Location: New Zealand

Post by Annie » Mon Nov 05, 2012 12:07 am

Very clever and nicely done too. I like these couplings as well, but they do stick out a bit far which can look odd on some rolling stock.

Image
What has Reality done for you lately?

User avatar
IrishPeter
Driver
Driver
Posts: 1400
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2011 3:24 am
Location: 'Boro, VA

Post by IrishPeter » Mon Nov 05, 2012 12:23 am

The Isle of Man Railway's locomotives had handbakes only until the 1920s when vacuum brakes were added.  No.16 had steam brakes when new which was probably a good thing as she used for the heavy Port Erin Boat Trains.  In practice, the vacuum brakes were little used, there being no Island rule about using them.

When I first got acquainted with the IMR the usual practice was to use five or six (occasionally seven) car sets and to control them with handbrakes.  This was satisfactory as the regular guards knew when to apply the brake - for example, all the way from Keristal/Oakhill bridge to Douglas, and the last mile or so southbound into Ballasalla.  Otherwise, the usual drill was for the driver to whistle for brakes and for the guard to wind them down before the loco brakes were applied.  This prevented the train bunching behind the loco, and then snatching when the brakes came off.  The non-funtioning vacuum brake tended to perpetuate the Manx habit of creeping into stations and accelerating smartly away. Also with the dependence on handbrakes for stopping power the carriage handbrakes were maintained in fairly good condition, with those with the best brakes getting the most use. The same usually went for the locomotives

However...

Towards the end of her time in service No.5 Mona had a suspect handbrake.  It took about five turns before anything happened, and even when wound all the way on it was not fully applied.  Her regular driver liked to "run them" which was perfectly OK when she was paired with one of the brake carriages with good brakes - F40-44, F45/46 or F49 - but if she was paired with F19/20 (the Peel line regulars) or any of the other wooden framed brake coaches it could result in some 'knicker gripping moments.'  I'll leave the rest to your imagination.

These ays they usually run with four or five carriages on the hook and always with the vacuum brakes coupled up. The vacuum ejector basically knocks one carriage off the load an IMR can handle, so they will usually bank 6 coach trains out of Douglas, because if the loco is not steaming well the brakes will start and leak on if the pressure falls below 100psi. In former times they would take 6 or 7 single handed, up the bank, though exceptionally (dry day and a good loco) they would take 8.

One other thing to remember about IMR locomotives is not all of them had steam heating gear.  This was fitted in the 1930s, but only those locomotives in regular use through the winter were ever fitted.  In phots from the 1950s I have only ever seen photos of the gear fitted to Nos. 1, 3, 5, 6, 11, 13 and 14.   I have gotten the general impression for the photographic record that it was fitted only to those locomotives in regular winter service.  In the early 1950 this would have been 4/5 locomotives, but by the mid-1960s this would have been one - two at the most as the railcars had taken over the winter skeleton service.  The old joke was 'you could have continuous brake or warm feet, or neither if the engine were not steaming well.' The thing to look for is an extra narrow diameter copper pipe running along the left side of the boiler. It is usually a bit mprovized looking!

Peter in AZ
Traffic Pattern? What pattern? Spuds out; grain in, but cattle, sheep and passengers are a lot less predictable.

User avatar
GTB
Driver
Driver
Posts: 1559
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2011 2:46 pm
Location: Australia

Post by GTB » Mon Nov 05, 2012 11:50 am

tom_tom_go:76453 wrote:here are the pics of the modified coupler you wanted (sorry it took so long!)
Thanks Tom,

Interesting, the W&L couplers have less metal around the pivot than the L&B type.

I shortened the couplers on my locos last week, but only managed to reduce the overall length by 1/8". I ended up fitting side control springs, made out of phos bronze sheet, to keep the shank centred. The spring is the W shaped bit in the photo.


Image

Graeme

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests