Marc Horovitz is Wrong. (IMO)
Re: Marc Horovitz is Wrong. (IMO) .
Besides, I don't know if I can change the name for the entire subject.
Yes, the OP can. You need to go back to the very first post in this thread and edit it by changing the "Subject".
However, with a long rambling thread like this one, you run the risk of folks not finding it again.
Yes, the OP can. You need to go back to the very first post in this thread and edit it by changing the "Subject".
However, with a long rambling thread like this one, you run the risk of folks not finding it again.
Miles-- Trains are fun. With the exception of track power. Argh!
In search of the ugliest train
Some talented modelers do seem to be making it about garden railways, though. (It followed us to the forum... can we keep it?)
To keep the conversation on track, here's an early American loco that seems to fit the bill: I always wondered why early toy trains often looked so spindly and had smokestacks of comical proportions. Turns out the real ones did too!
To keep the conversation on track, here's an early American loco that seems to fit the bill: I always wondered why early toy trains often looked so spindly and had smokestacks of comical proportions. Turns out the real ones did too!
- GAP
- Trainee Driver
- Posts: 712
- Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2012 10:34 pm
- Location: Bundaberg QLD Australia
- Contact:
Re: Marc Horovitz is Wrong. (IMO)
Marc Horovitzdrewzero1 wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2023 5:13 amAs far as I can tell it's on topic or close enough, but maybe we could change the name to "In search of the ugliest train" or something more generic like that? I don't know who Marc Horovitz is and don't want to wish him ill, but I'm enjoying the general conversation. Maybe a mod or other experienced member has a suggestion... I'm still pretty new here myself and still getting the hang of the way we do things.
https://www.trains.com/grw/news-reviews ... -horovitz/
Graeme
From the home of the Ringbalin Light Railway
https://ringbalin-light-railway.blogspo ... -page.html
From the home of the Ringbalin Light Railway
https://ringbalin-light-railway.blogspo ... -page.html
Re: Marc Horovitz is Wrong. (IMO) .
Yes, the OP can. You need to go back to the very first post in this thread and edit it by changing the "Subject".
However, with a long rambling thread like this one, you run the risk of folks not finding it again.
Philip
Re: In search of the ugliest train
Much of the reason for the spindliness would have been to allow them to sell for ridiculously cheap prices, around $20 in today's money for a live steam loco.
Miles-- Trains are fun. With the exception of track power. Argh!
Re: In search of the ugliest train
What is this one? You don't see many American 2-2-2's. Kinda looks like a "storkleg" toy but with a trailing axle.
Miles-- Trains are fun. With the exception of track power. Argh!
Re: In search of the ugliest train
It appears to be the Cumberland Valley Railroad's "Pioneer" of 1851: https://americanhistory.si.edu/collections/nmah_875724
Surprisingly, made it into preservation!
Re: Marc Horovitz is Wrong. (IMO)
It seems like it might make a fairly decent looking 2-2-0 tender loco!
Miles-- Trains are fun. With the exception of track power. Argh!
Re: Marc Horovitz is Wrong. (IMO)
I did a quick search on 2-2-2 locos
https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/Ca ... ocomotives
I hadn't realised there were so many variants
Rik
https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/Ca ... ocomotives
I hadn't realised there were so many variants
Rik
Re: Marc Horovitz is Wrong. (IMO)
The Belpaire locomotive:http://douglas-self.com/MUSEUM/LOCOLOCO ... elgian.htm
Though a forward-thinking design with the cab-forward layout, it sure isn't the prettiest thing on rails.
Though a forward-thinking design with the cab-forward layout, it sure isn't the prettiest thing on rails.
Re: Marc Horovitz is Wrong. (IMO)
This must be the ugliest one yet.
Miles-- Trains are fun. With the exception of track power. Argh!
- GAP
- Trainee Driver
- Posts: 712
- Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2012 10:34 pm
- Location: Bundaberg QLD Australia
- Contact:
Re: Marc Horovitz is Wrong. (IMO)
I don't know the hand rails add to the aesthetics a certain je ne sais quoi
Graeme
From the home of the Ringbalin Light Railway
https://ringbalin-light-railway.blogspo ... -page.html
From the home of the Ringbalin Light Railway
https://ringbalin-light-railway.blogspo ... -page.html
Re: Marc Horovitz is Wrong. (IMO)
I guess I missed this.... This is what I was getting all mad about!
http://sidestreet.info/aesthetics/contents.html
http://sidestreet.info/aesthetics/contents.html
Miles-- Trains are fun. With the exception of track power. Argh!
Re: Marc Horovitz is Wrong. (IMO)
Now isn't this a beauty......??
Miles-- Trains are fun. With the exception of track power. Argh!
- Peter Butler
- Driver
- Posts: 5376
- Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2012 10:33 pm
- Location: West Wales
Re: Marc Horovitz is Wrong. (IMO)
I love it Miles, especially the curtains! So, is it a 0-4-2 or a 2-4-0?... Which end is the front?
The best things in life are free.... so why am I doing this?
Re: Marc Horovitz is Wrong. (IMO)
In like the gazebo on the back (or front)
Rik
Rik
Re: Marc Horovitz is Wrong. (IMO)
An 0-4-2, with driver and fireman on the open part on the front I think, based on the direction of that horn.Peter Butler wrote: ↑Wed Dec 20, 2023 2:45 pm I love it Miles, especially the curtains! So, is it a 0-4-2 or a 2-4-0?... Which end is the front?
Edit: That could be a tube for communication between the two ends, whatever that's called.
Miles-- Trains are fun. With the exception of track power. Argh!
Re: Marc Horovitz is Wrong. (IMO)
I wonder if it's some kind of inspection vehicle, with the passenger compartment being for the crew.
Miles-- Trains are fun. With the exception of track power. Argh!
- GAP
- Trainee Driver
- Posts: 712
- Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2012 10:34 pm
- Location: Bundaberg QLD Australia
- Contact:
Re: Marc Horovitz is Wrong. (IMO)
Speaking tube, still used on ships to this day.dudeface wrote: ↑Wed Dec 20, 2023 3:44 pmAn 0-4-2, with driver and fireman on the open part on the front I think, based on the direction of that horn.Peter Butler wrote: ↑Wed Dec 20, 2023 2:45 pm I love it Miles, especially the curtains! So, is it a 0-4-2 or a 2-4-0?... Which end is the front?
Edit: That could be a tube for communication between the two ends, whatever that's called.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speaking_tube
Graeme
From the home of the Ringbalin Light Railway
https://ringbalin-light-railway.blogspo ... -page.html
From the home of the Ringbalin Light Railway
https://ringbalin-light-railway.blogspo ... -page.html
- Peter Butler
- Driver
- Posts: 5376
- Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2012 10:33 pm
- Location: West Wales
Re: Marc Horovitz is Wrong. (IMO)
My guess would be for transporting the Chief Inspector and/or important guests of a fairly modest railway.
A little further up the scale of importance would be the Viceroy of India during Victorian days of The Raj. This is the vehicle I have wanted to build more than any other for many years but always chickened out!...
The best things in life are free.... so why am I doing this?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest